Tuesday, September 27, 2016

Tristan and Isolde


Photo

Stuart Skelton, left, as Tristan and Nina Stemme as Isolde in “Tristan und Isolde” at the Metropolitan Opera.CreditSara Krulwich/The New York Times

The all-consuming, mystifying love story at the core of Wagner’s “Tristan und Isolde” unfolds against a medieval tale of war between Cornwall and Ireland. Many productions employ imagery of sailors, military conquest and retribution but keep the focus on Wagner’s exploration of love, desire and death.
In the Metropolitan Opera’s audacious new production, which opened the season on Monday night, the director Mariusz Trelinski makes the background story of warring nations explicit, sometimes intrusive. During the great orchestra prelude to Act I, video projections (by Bartek Macias) on a scrim depict an enormous nautical compass and a churning, blackish sea. When the scrim lifts, the stage is filled with an eerily realistic, modern-day, three-decker warship (the set designer is Boris Kudlicka). It looks like a gargantuan maritime dollhouse.
Isolde, the Irish princess who is being transported to Cornwall to marry its king, Marke, is confined to what passes for a stateroom, with a dingy couch and makeshift pantry. The ship is being navigated by Tristan, a noble knight and King Marke’s adopted heir, whom we first see standing on the top deck before various electronic panels and equipment, including surveillance video to check on Isolde.
As Mr. Trelinski has explained in interviews, he sees the ship in “Tristan” as both real and metaphorical. Tristan guides the ship, Mr. Trelinski said, to the “edge of night,” to his own and Isolde’s transcendent deaths. As the opera progresses, the staging becomes increasingly metaphorical, confusingly so.
Still, his concept has intriguing elements and is strongly complemented by the compelling, vulnerable performances he draws from a strong cast, especially the astonishing soprano Nina Stemme as Isolde. And on every step of this Wagnerian trip to the edge of night, the way was led by the conductor Simon Rattle, finally back at the Met after his momentous 2010 company debut in Debussy’s “Pelléas et Mélisande.”
Mr. Rattle’s performance of Wagner’s monumental score, some four hours of music, impressively balanced clarity and richness, coolness and intensity, intelligence and impetuosity. The composer’s harmonic language, which ventures into bold, radical chromaticism, came through in rich, full-bodied orchestral sound. Mr. Rattle also brought uncanny transparency to the contrapuntal lines that mingle continuously in the music. Climactic passages crested with sound, and dramatic episodes generated plenty of heat. Still, Mr. Rattle is not one for swelling, emotive passion. Rather, he goes for incisiveness and vehemence.
Last season, Ms. Stemme triumphed in the title role of Strauss’s “Elektra” when the Met presented Patrice Chéreau’s stunning production. Her Isolde is just as outstanding. Her voice has enormous carrying power without any forcing. Gleaming, focused top notes slice through the orchestra. As Isolde went through swings of thwarted fury, yearning and despair, Ms. Stemme altered the colorings of her sound, from steely rawness to melting warmth. And it is not often you hear a Wagnerian soprano who takes care to sing with rhythmic fidelity and crisp diction.
Photo

Evgeny Nikitin, left, as Kurwenal and Mr. Skelton as Tristan. CreditSara Krulwich/The New York Times

If Isolde is a summit for select dramatic sopranos, Tristan may be an even harder assignment for a heldentenor. This production is lucky to have Stuart Skelton, who gives an honorable and courageous performance. His muscular voice may lack some warmth and ping. But he sings with musical integrity and feeling. And he paced himself impressively during the long, arduous scene in Act III when Tristan, mortally wounded and delirious, back at his ancestral home in Brittany, awaits Isolde. Attended by his loyal servant Kurwenal (the solid bass-baritone Evgeny Nikitin), Tristan keeps thinking he sees Isolde’s ship on the horizon, only to be shattered with disappointment, until she finally arrives, too late.
Mr. Trelinski surely deserves some credit for the subtle, effective acting of his cast. But the set designs, especially the warship of Act I, sometimes get in the way, as in the riveting scene when Isolde tells Brangäne, her loyal maid (the rich-voiced mezzo-soprano Ekaterina Gubanova), the full story of why she dreads marrying King Marke. Isolde pouts on the floor in front of the couch as Brangäne maternally strokes Isolde’s hair. But the intimacy these two artists achieve is undermined because the midtier room they are confined to seems boxy and distant from the audience.



Continue reading the main story

The staging works better later in this act when Tristan agrees to meet Isolde and make an act of atonement by sharing a drink. Mr. Trelinski delves enticingly into one of the mysteries of the opera: What is this potion they drink? Isolde thinks she hates Tristan, who killed her fiancé in battle, then returned in disguise, whereupon Isolde healed Tristan’s wound through her magical arts, only to learn who he really was. Still, the encounter roused feelings of love between them, feelings they must vanquish.
On the ship, Isolde wants to share a drink of poison that will actually kill them. But Brangäne substitutes a love potion. Does it have any actual effect? One interpretation is that by embracing what they think is death, Tristan and Isolde enter Schopenhauer’s realm of love as an impossible yearning that can only be resolved in death. This actually releases their love. Mr. Trelinski has the two singers react to the drink with shock and panic. What have we done? What have we unleashed?
Act II, when Tristan and Isolde meet furtively at night, takes place here in a kind of lookout post that is part of the metaphoric ship. They descend slowly into a dark room full of what looks like fuel tanks and armaments, a dreary space. At the climax of their passion, they are discovered by the henchmen of King Marke, who come with glaring flashlights and kick Tristan almost unconscious. Then the formidable bass René Pape appears as the king, wearing a handsome white military uniform. Marke is less angry than hurt and confused by Tristan’s betrayal with the woman who is to become queen. Mr. Pape brought opulent sound and affecting dignity to the king’s aching monologue.
Metaphor sometimes becomes symbolism in Mr. Trelinski’s staging, and that’s another thing entirely. In Act III, as Tristan lies wounded on a hospital bed, a little boy, an invented silent character, approaches him curiously. Mr. Trelinski is clearly moved by a theme other directors gloss over: Tristan was an orphan and still longs for his parents. Introducing this little boy is poignant to a degree but begins to seem heavy-handed.
The production ends with a directorial touch that some Wagner fans may hate (perhaps one reason the production team drew scattered boos during final ovations). Before singing the “Liebestod,” the invocation to love-death, Ms. Stemme’s Isolde slashes her wrist with a knife, precipitating her death. But Wagner’s idea was that Isolde sinks into death transfigured, now united with the dead Tristan — the only possible resolution of desire and passion.
Every time I got impatient with this production, aspects of it drew me back in. I wonder, though, if my reaction was mostly due to the fine singing and the great work of Mr. Rattle and the orchestra. When Ms. Stemme’s Isolde, during the “Liebestod,” wonders whether she alone is hearing mysterious shimmering sounds engulfing her, everyone in the house could hear them too, coming from the great Met orchestra.

Friday, September 16, 2016

Kandel Uses Lecture to Change Minds Of Psychiatrists




Nobel laureate Eric Kandel, M.D. (right), is presented with APA’s 2001 Marmor Award by APA Medical Director Steven Mirin, M.D. (center), and John Greden, M.D., chair of the Council on Research, for his substantial research advancing the biopsychosocial model of psychiatry.
Noting that “we are what we are through what we have experienced and what we have remembered,” this year’s APA Marmor Award lecturer, Eric R. Kandel, M.D., detailed fundamental cellular processes underlying the biological connection between the mind and the brain. But what the audience of nearly 2,000 annual meeting attendees took away from the lecture was Kandel’s promise that his lecture would change their minds, literally as well as figuratively.
“When I came up with the annual meeting theme of ‘Mind Meets Brain,’ ” said APA President Daniel Borenstein, M.D., in introducing Kandel, “the first person I thought of to invite to speak at this meeting was Dr. Kandel. I was delighted to have him accept. I think he truly epitomizes where we are in our science at this point.”
APA Medical Director Steven Mirin, M.D., presenting the 2001 Marmor Award to Kandel, said, “Dr. Kandel’s work has been essential, not only for our basic understanding of the mechanisms of learning and memory, but also for highlighting many of the cellular processes that are affected by psychiatric medications.”
The Marmor Award lectureship is awarded annually to a researcher who significantly advances the biopsychosocial model of psychiatry. The award was endowed by former APA President Judd Marmor, M.D.
“I am keenly aware of the fact,” Kandel said, “that awards such as [the Nobel Prize] recognize not only Arvid Carlson, Paul Greengard [with whom he shared the 2000 Nobel Prize in Medicine], and myself, but recognize research into the biology of mental problems on the whole. It really recognizes the prominence of psychiatry that is emerging throughout the world.”
The molecular basis of learning and memory fascinated him so much, Kandel told the standing-room-only audience, because it addresses one of the most remarkable aspects of human behavior, the ability to acquire new ideas and patterns of thought from experience. “Many psychological and emotional processes are thought to be built on experience and specifically on learning,” Kandel said.
Kandel described his 40 years of research into the cellular processes underlying learning and memory, first in the sea slug Aplysia, then later in mice. Displaying for the audience a comically altered photograph of one of his “pet” snails, Kandel commented, “Aplysia is a very beautiful animal, just the sort of animal that anyone would pick for research into learning and memory.”
He and his colleagues chose the snail because of the remarkably low number of relatively large neurons in its nervous system. Yet with only 20,000 neurons total, some large enough to see with the naked eye, the animal is capable of displaying modifications in its behavior due to environmental stimuli—otherwise referred to as the ability to learn.

Eric Kandel, M.D.: “We are what we are through what we have experienced and what we have remembered.”
“ What learning does is to change the strength of the synaptic connections in the brain,” Kandel explained, “and this has held true for every form of learning so far analyzed. So, what genetic and developmental processes do is specify the cells that connect to each other, but what they do not specify is the exact strength of those connections. Environmental contingencies, such as learning, play a significant part in the strength of those connections.”
Different forms of learning result in memories by changing that strength in different ways. Short-term memory results from transient changes that last minutes and does not require any new synthesis of proteins, Kandel said. However, long-term memories are based in more lasting changes of days to weeks that do require new brain protein to be synthesized. And this synthesis requires the input of the neuron’s genes.

“A learning event—a social experience, a psychotherapeutic event—is capable of activating genes in the brain of experimental animals and people,” Kandel explained, and this new gene expression leads to a change in behavior as a result of learning and memory.
“If you were to remember anything at all about this lecture,” Kandel emphasized, “it is because you walk out of this lecture with a somewhat different head than when you walked in—and all without taking any drugs!
“And I tell you that insofar as psychotherapy produces enduring changes in peoples’ behavior, it does so by producing enduring changes in peoples’ brains; and those enduring changes are carried by changes in the structure of the brain.”
Kandel said that the study of memory storage has not only provided insight into the process of memory storage itself, but also revealed completely unanticipated features of the cell biology of neurons, which would not have happened unless researchers such as himself had approached the brain with specific psychological questions in mind.
“And I am confident,” he concluded, “that as the biology of the mind takes over the central stage of medicine as a whole, the contributions that will come will have enormous impact on the practice of medicine. There is every reason to believe that the biology of the mind will capture the excitement of the scientific community in the next 50 years the way the biology of the gene has captured the imaginations of the scientists of the last 50 years.”
It is inevitable, Kandel declared, that the contributions that come from the study of the biology of the mind will be recognized as among the most significant contributions of all time.
Kandel acknowledged that he finds it awkward to think of himself as the only American psychiatrist ever to have been awarded the Nobel Prize. “One would hope that in the future, as young people move into psychiatric research, their contributions will so enrich our field that many, many more recognitions will come.” ▪