Tuesday, July 3, 2018

Lohengrin review


 – Klaus Florian Vogt compelling in sharp Mitteleurope update

4/5stars4 out of 5 stars.
Royal Opera House, London
Director David Alden pushes the power politics in the war-ravaged setting for the ROH’s first new Lohengrin for 41 years
Jennifer Davis as Elsa von Brabant and Klaus Florian Vogt as Lohengrin
 Wagner by way of Barry Manilow … Jennifer Davis as Elsa von Brabant and Klaus Florian Vogt as Lohengrin. Photograph: Tristram Kenton for the Guardian
It’s 41 years since the Royal Opera introduced a new Lohengrin. That production, directed by Elijah Moshinsky and last seen in 2009, was a largely traditional affair, crammed with dark-ages Christian and pagan symbolism reflecting the strange mixture in Wagner’s libretto. Its replacement, directed by David Alden (his second new Covent Garden show of the season, after last autumn’s Semiramide), takes a very different line. Paul Steinberg’s designs and Gideon Davey’s costumes suggest a relocation to the first half of the 20th century, somewhere in central Europe. The skewed brick facades of the modular set, with their gaping windows and steel gangways and girders, imply a country ravaged by war and a society teetering on the brink of totalitarianism, a threat that becomes vividly real before the end of the opera.
For Alden, it’s all about power politics – the story of an enfeebled king, so desperate to assert his authority that he wears his crown throughout, who sees the arrival of Lohengrin as the answer to his expansionist prayers and the means of turning around the fortunes of his beaten army. To King Heinrich, Elsa’s fate and, to some extent, the machinations of Ortrud and Telramund are subsidiary. Perhaps Ortrud’s invocation of the dark arts sits rather uneasily in this modern militaristic world, and there’s little symbolism here, except for the eruption of flags in the final scene, all emblazoned with a swan, which has become a fascist emblem. The only references to Christianity are the unavoidable ones in the text, while the famous wedding march at the beginning of the third act is wryly sent up on stage.
As one would expect from this director, everything about the production is vividly detailed and thoughtfully cogent, typically lit from low angles to produce looming expressionist shadows and stark contrasts. Every one of the protagonists is sharply defined. There’s no boat and no swan for Lohengrin’s arrival or departure, just a lighting effect to suggest its beating wings, as the set splits to reveal Klaus Florian Vogt sitting on the ground, in a white suit and open-necked shirt, for all the world like a 1970s pop singer: a Bee Gee perhaps or Barry Manilow.
Lohengrin
Pinterest
 Expressionist shadows … Lohengrin. Photograph: Tristram Kenton for the Guardian
Vogt begins and ends his role in a rather disembodied mezza voce, and if his tone never becomes exactly fulsome, he is always compelling, especially when singing quietly. Every word counts, and Lohengrin’s revelation of who he is in the final scene is spellbinding. He’s well matched also to the Else of Jennifer Davis, who conveys innocence and vulnerability in a thoroughly musical way. A product of the Jette Parker young artists’ scheme, Davis is a lyric soprano with a bit of extra steel, and a more than plausible actor. Their antagonists are nicely complementary, too – if Thomas J Mayer’s ranting Telramund sometimes strays into pantomime-villain territory, he contrasts perfectly with this Ortrud, as Christine Goerke moves from icy control to avenging vamp at the flick of a switch, even if the vocal ride is bumpy at times.
Together with Georg Zeppenfeld’s vacillating king and Kostas Smoriginas’s threatening, crippled Herald, they all fit perfectly into Alden’s dramatic scheme, and integrate just as smoothly into Andris Nelsons’ musical one. Nelsons’ gloriously comprehensive conducting, full of moments of quiet, rapt intensity and surging, tremulous excitement, superbly realised by the ROH Orchestra, is one of this new production’s biggest plusses of all.
  • This article was amended on 10 June 2018. The previous version stated the king’s name as Friedrich.

Since you’re here …

… we have a small favour to ask. More people are reading the Guardian than ever but advertising revenues across the media are falling fast. And unlike many news organisations, we haven’t put up a paywall – we want to keep our journalism as open as we can. So you can see why we need to ask for your help. The Guardian’s independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our perspective matters – because it might well be your perspective, too.
The Guardian is editorially independent, meaning we set our own agenda. Our journalism is free from commercial bias and not influenced by billionaire owners, politicians or shareholders. No one edits our Editor. No one steers our opinion. This is important because it enables us to give a voice to the voiceless, challenge the powerful and hold them to account. It’s what makes us different to so many others in the media, at a time when factual, honest reporting is critical.
If everyone who reads our reporting, who likes it, helps to support it, our future would be much more secure. For as little as $1, you can support the Guardian – and it only takes a minute. Thank you.

Saturday, June 30, 2018

Pelléas et Mélisande review

– crashing symbols overpower doomed lovers

3/5stars3 out of 5 stars.
Glyndebourne Opera House, Lewes 
The many layers of Stefan Herheim’s staging prove detaching distractions from the twisted mystery of the Debussy tragedy
Bereft … Christina Gansch as Mélisande and Christopher Purves as Golaud in Debussy’s Pelléas et Mélisande.
 Bereft … Christina Gansch as Mélisande and Christopher Purves as Golaud in Debussy’s Pelléas et Mélisande. Photograph: Tristram Kenton for the Guardian
Anyone visiting Glyndebourne for its new production of Pelléas et Mélisande would be advised to take a quick tour around the organ room there before curtain-up, to remind themselves of its layout and the paintings on the walls. For Stefan Herheim’s staging, handsomely designed by Philipp Fürhofer, faithfully re-creates that space, which once housed the largest British organ not in a cathedral, and which is still dominated by the case and surviving pipes of that huge instrument.
Herheim’s production is set in the period between the world wars when John Christie took over Glyndebourne, had the organ built, and started hosting opera performances there. But that self-referential mise-en-scène proves to just one of the multiple layers of allusion presented here, only striking a false note at the woefully banal final curtain. By then, though, the plethora of symbolism loaded on to what is already the archetypal symbolist opera has become a real distraction from the central tragedy of this emotionally bereft and isolated royal family.
There’s just too much to wonder and worry about – why, for instance, are there references to pre-Raphaelite imagery – in the long, red hair of Golaud’s fantasy Mélisande, or the image of Christ carrying a lamb on his shoulders in the third act; why in act 4 does the shepherd become a priest, sanctifying or perhaps giving communion to the household staff; and what does a line of empty easels across the stage signify in the third act?
Pre-Raphaelite imagery … John Chest, centre, as Pelléas.
Pinterest
 Pre-Raphaelite imagery … John Chest, centre, as Pelléas. Photograph: Tristram Kenton for the Guardian
Some of Herheim’s other glosses seem more appropriate and do make a deeply disturbing opera even more disturbing – Golaud’s abuse of his son Yniold is sexual as well as psychological here, and Golaud blinds Pelléas and later Mélisande too, as if mimicking Arkel’s near-blindness, in a world in which truth and reality are always hard to glimpse. But alongside that heightened theatre of cruelty, conductor Robin Ticciati’s warm and beautifully played reading of the score, looking back to Gounod more than forward to Stravinsky and Bartók, seems out of place, and even the most shocking moments are presented in such a chilly and detached way, it’s hard to muster sympathy for any of the protagonists.
Even Christina Gansch’s Mélisande, beautifully sung, and catching the balance between ethereal mystery and passionate involvement perfectly, is kept at arm’s length, while the baritone Pelléas, John Chest, seems to move a little too easily from the shy gaucheness of his first appearance to his willing complicity with Mélisande. But Christopher Purves’s Golaud is the main casualty of the approach. In most productions of Pelléas it’s possible to feel pity for Golaud without condoning his actions, but there’s little chance of that here, as he seems to move farther out of focus as the opera goes on and his insane jealousy increases. By the end he has become just a husk, barely responsible for his actions but also hard to place in the final tragedy, which almost seems to be orchestrated by Brindley Sherratt’s Arkel, though on the first night Sherratt had a throat infection and walked through the role, while it was sung rather formidably from beside the stage by Richard Wiegold. Karen Cargill’s wonderfully rich-toned Geneviève has little to do, alas, while Yniold is sung by a soprano, Chloé Briot; given that he becomes a surrogate for Mélisande in Herheim’s reading, that’s no bad thing.