A
keyboard masterpiece depends on the complex relationship between sound waves
and musical notes.
Along with
my usual chocolate Advent calendar, this year I decided to make myself a kind
of musical Advent calendar by playing through a book of J.S. Bach’s “The
Well-Tempered Keyboard,” a monumental collection of 24 preludes and fugues.
Playing one a day made a perfect fit with my chocolates and the run-up to
Christmas Eve.
Bach
didn’t choose the number 24 arbitrarily. In Western music there are 12 notes in
an octave, and for each note there is a major and a minor key, making 24 in
total. To understand why there are 12 notes in an octave, rather than 10 or 14,
we have to look at the math of sound waves.
The pitch
of a note is determined by the frequency of its sound wave—that is, how many
identical segments of the wave, or oscillations, pass a fixed point in a given
period of time. The higher the frequency of a sound wave, the higher the pitch
it produces. Harmony in music involves combining sound waves of different
frequencies, making use of the fact that some waves reinforce one another while
others interfere.
For any
musical note, the note that goes with it most harmoniously is the same note one
octave higher. That’s because the higher note has exactly twice the frequency,
leading the two sound waves to oscillate together neatly. The next most
harmonious note will be the one with three times the frequency, which in
musical terms is a perfect fifth higher—for instance, the jump from C to G,
which you can hear at the beginning of “Twinkle, Twinkle Little Star.”
If we keep
going up by perfect fifths, we get a sequence of harmonious intervals known as
the cycle of fifths. The first five notes in the cycle form the pentatonic
scale, which is used in the music of many ancient cultures. If we keep going up
to seven notes, we get the notes of the major scale prevalent in Western
classical music. Taking 12 notes of the cycle of fifths produces the 12 notes
of the piano keyboard.
After 12
steps, something fortuitous happens: We get to a note that is almost the same
as the one we started with, but seven octaves higher. The 12 notes of the
keyboard essentially come from this numerical coincidence between the
frequencies for seven octaves and 12 fifths. But there is still a slight
mismatch in the frequencies—less than a quarter of the distance between two
adjacent notes.
Before
Bach’s time, the typical approach was to “hide” this error in notes that the
music was unlikely to use, like when you stuff your mess in a bedroom before
guests come around. For example, if a piece of music is in the key of C major,
it’s important for F and G to sound perfectly in tune, since they’re the fourth
and fifth notes of the scale; but it’s less important for F sharp to sound
right, since it will barely be used.
Musicians
eventually had the idea of spreading the mess out more evenly so that no note
would sound quite so wrong. This type of tuning of a keyboard is called
“well-tempered,” hence the title Bach gave to his work. For the first time it
was possible to play music in all the keys without some of them sounding out of
tune, and Bach wrote a prelude and fugue in every key to explore and perhaps
celebrate this fact.
People
celebrate different things at this time of year, and many people have little to
celebrate in 2020. But I will at least celebrate the beautiful effect that math
can have on unexpected parts of life.
I was in Thailand two years ago and I visited a friend who has a grandson in Minnesota. She said, "I could not understand him, from Thailand to Minnesota, the temperature in the winter is 100° different.
Even now it is between 11° F and 32°F.
But I told her that Minnesota is famous for the MMPI (Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory), one of the most frequently used tests in psychiatry, her grandson was studying medicine there and wanted to be a psychiatrist!
Now it may become famous for something else.
In the New York Times today: Autism Rates Are Higher for U.S.-Born Somali Children in Minneapolis April 1,2009 "Confirming the fears of Somali immigrants in Minneapolis, the Minnesota Health Department agreed Tuesday that young Somali children there appeared to have higher-than-usual rates of autism. "Though health officials emphasized that their report was based on very limited data, they concluded that young Somali children appeared to be two to seven times as likely as other children to be in classes for autistic pupils.
"Dr. Sanne Magnan, the state health commissioner, said the finding was ‘consistent with the observations by parents,’ who have been saying for more than a year that alarming numbers of Somali children born in this country have severe autism. Somalis began immigrating into the area in the 1990s, fleeing civil war in their homeland. The report made no effort to explain why the children had autism. Its authors did not examine children or their medical records. They accepted the diagnoses — some by doctors, some by school evaluators — that admitted children to special-education classes, and they calculated rates for different ethnic groups. They counted only 3- to 4-year-olds, only children in Minneapolis public schools, and only children born in Minnesota. They drew no comparisons with Somalis in other cities.
"There have been anecdotal reports of higher autism rates among Somalis in some American cities, and no formal studies. A small study in Sweden reported high rates among Somali schoolchildren in Stockholm.
"Idil Abdull, the mother of an autistic child who has long tried to draw attention to the Minneapolis situation, said she was “happy that they said, ‘Yes, there is a problem.’ ”
“But at least they didn’t say, ‘No, it’s all in your minds.’ If they had done that, I’d picket in front of their building.”
"Dr. Magnan noted that this study found “strikingly low” numbers of Asian and American Indian children in the same special-education classes. But she cautioned that the reason might not be lower autism rates; instead, parents might not be enrolling their children in those classes, or might be sending them to private schools. The Center for Disease Control and Prevention (C.D.C.) monitors autism diagnoses among 8-year-old children in 14 sites around the country, and in 2007 it estimated that about 1 child in 150 had an autism-spectrum disorder.
"Rates are roughly the same for whites and blacks, Catherine Rice, another C.D.C. official, said recently. They are lower among Hispanics, possibly because of poor medical care or cultural reticence, she said. Too few Asians were monitored to make estimates."
Fragile Lives: How Stephen Westaby's untried surgery saved ALCAPA baby Kirsty
"We shall never surrender."
Winston Churchill, during the Battle of Britain, 1940
Monday 15 February 1999, 3.45am. No one calls with good news at night. I'd been in Australia for just thirteen hours after a twenty-hour flight. In pitch darkness I scrambled across my hotel bed and knocked the receiver to the floor. The call was lost. I swiftly slipped back into sleep, courtesy of melatonin tablets and the bottle of Merlot I'd drunk at dinner. Ten minutes later the phone rang again. This time I fielded it successfully, but I was irritated.
"Westaby? This is Archer. Where are you?"
"Nick, you know I'm damned well in Australia. It's the middle of the f***ing night – what's the problem?""Steve, I'm sorry, but we need you to come back. We have a sick baby with ALCAPA. The parents know you and want you to do the surgery."
Oh joy. "When?"
"As soon as possible."
I really had no other choice.
Kirsty was a beautiful six-month-old baby girl in whom fate had installed a lethal self-destruct mechanism, a miserable detail that seemed destined to end her life before her first birthday. ALCAPA is an abbreviation for Anomalous Left Coronary Artery from the Pulmonary Artery, an isolated and exceptionally rare congenital anomaly in the overall complexity of human anatomy.
Simply put, it's bad wiring. Both coronary arteries should rise out of the aorta and supply the heart muscle with well-oxygenated blood under high pressure. They should never be attached to the pulmonary artery, as this has both low pressure and poor oxygen content. Early survival with ALCAPA therefore depends on the development of new "collateral" blood vessels between the normal right coronary artery and the misplaced left coronary artery. But these eventually are insufficient to sustain blood flow to the main pumping chamber.
Muscle cells deprived of oxygen die and are replaced by scar tissue, leaving baby to suffer what are in effect repeated, painful heart attacks. Scar tissue stretches, causing the left ventricle to dilate, then the heart progressively fails and the lungs become congested with blood, leading to breathlessness and exhaustion. Even during feeding.
But because ALCAPA is exceedingly rare, the diagnosis is seldom made until the infant is terminally ill. Fortunately, her parents were intelligent, had recognised that there was a serious problem and were persistent in finding help for her.
Kirsty's story was particularly harrowing. Her mother Becky already had a three-year-old son and was an experienced and responsible mum. All antenatal checks and ultra-sound scans had appeared normal. Kirsty was born on August 21, 1998, by elective Caesarean section with a spinal anaesthetic and at first everything seemed normal. But not for long.
In the womb, the pressures and oxygen content of the aorta and pulmonary artery are the same, so Kirsty's tiny heart was safe. After birth, the circulations to the body and newly expanded lungs separate, and both pressure and oxygen content in the pulmonary artery fall. So, in cases of ALCAPA, both blood flow and oxygen content in that critically important left coronary artery fall precipitously, too.
Kirsty was grunting even during the first attempt to breastfeed in the hospital, and Becky noticed beads of sweat trickling from the bridge of her baby's nose. The effort of feeding repeatedly made her fractious and distressed.
This was distinctly different from how her son had been, so Becky asked for a paediatrician to review Kirsty. She was told that there was absolutely nothing to worry about but the truth was that no one had bothered to find out what was wrong.At this stage, Becky had little choice but to take her irritable but precious little bundle home.
Within weeks Becky was certain that something was seriously amiss, because during every feed there was sweating and vomiting. Kirsty struggled for breath, clenched her little fists and screamed until she was puce in the face. Together they made many visits to the GP, sometimes as many as three times a week, but they always received the same non-committal reassurance – tense, unpleasant encounters, as Becky was deemed neurotic and unable to cope.
Despite Kirsty's rapid breathing she had no temperature. Chest infections were ruled out, and her belly was soft, with no signs of stomach or intestinal blockage. All of the common paediatric problems were excluded. Becky became more and more anxious. Kirsty wasn't gaining weight. She had a pasty, washed-out look and a cough like a dog's bark.
In reality this baby was suffering repeated small heart attacks with excruciating chest pain that she could neither communicate nor understand. The human body can be outlandishly cruel.
Eventually, after a meltdown in the GP's surgery, Becky insisted that Kirsty should be referred to the local hospital. Twice she had chest X-rays, only to be diagnosed with bronchiolitis – inflamed breathing tubes – on both occasions. Then one day during her afternoon nap Kirsty turned a terrible slate-grey colour. She was barely rousable and limp. Becky snatched her up and rushed to the surgery. But by the time they presented themselves at the receptionist the baby was awake and pink again.
Becky was told to stop fussing and that there were children to be seen who were actually sick. On this occasion mother and child were acrimoniously dispatched, once more with a prescription for antibiotics. Kirsty's enormous heart remained undetected.
This time, Becky drove directly to the accident and emergency department of her small local hospital. They were seen by a sympathetic female doctor who had children of her own. Recognising that a mother's instinct was usually correct, she referred them on to a larger city hospital for review by the on-call paediatrician.
It was a bitterly cold, frosty night and they were left sitting in an unheated hospital corridor for several hours. Becky frantically struggled to keep Kirsty warm but she became progressively more limp and grey. Eventually, late into the night, they were seen. The first junior doctor suggested bronchiolitis and intended to dismiss them without investigation.
Beckyrefused to leave without a chest X-ray. She was told off for her unreasonable attitude – how thoughtless to inconvenience the hard-pressed duty radiographer at that time of night. So the sad pair were dispatched unescorted down poorly lit corridors and icy outside walkways to find their own way to the X-ray department. It was well past midnight when they returned, clutching the tell-tale picture, which Becky presented to a nurse. They were parked once more.
Another thirty minutes passed, then a dramatic shift in attitude from the hospital staff. Now there were hushed voices, grave expressions, and nurses bringing drips and drugs. The previously mean, now embarrassed nurse took Becky aside to explain that Kirsty was being transferred to the specialist children's heart unit in Oxford. By ambulance this time.
So what did the X-ray show to trigger this frenzy of activity? Kirsty had a massive heart. Her problem was immediately obvious on the X-ray film. When the staff were pressed about her previous X-rays at the same hospital, Becky was told that the heart shadow had been misinterpreted as fluid. Some mistake!
In Oxford, the paediatric cardiology registrar met the ambulance and took them directly to a ward packed with children with serious heart problems and beeping monitors – a hive of activity in the depths of night.
Nick Archer arrived at 3am. An ECG and blood tests were done quickly, then the echo machine was brought in to image Kirsty's heart chambers. First it seemed like good news. All four chambers were there, with no holes between them. But worryingly the left atrium and ventricle were both enlarged, the ventricle dramatically so. This explained the heart failure and accounted for the striking chest X-ray.
In little more than an hour, the cardiology team established that Kirsty had severe heart failure from multiple heart attacks. Parts of the left ventricular wall now consisted of thin scar tissue interspersed with poorly contracting muscle, a rare condition in an infant but one that provided the likely diagnosis. One further test was needed. A cardiac catheter would confirm the diagnosis but would require a general anaesthetic, so she'd have to be in much better condition before proceeding.
It was a full five weeks before Becky's baby was considered fit enough for the cardiac catheter. The evening before the operation, the anaesthetist came round to talk. Normally a jolly and optimistic character, on this occasion he didn't have much to smile about. That night, Kirsty was christened in her cot by the hospital chaplain, the doctors, nurses and other families gathering around the bed to support them.
That morning, Becky dressed her baby in her best pyjamas and tied a bow in her hair for her trip to the catheterisation laboratory. Ironically it was Valentine's Day. As Becky put it to me later, "A girl has to look her best, even when she's poorly.":
Once I was on the plane home I started to sketch the anatomy of Kirsty's aorta, pulmonary artery and abnormal left coronary artery. I knew that the current techniques in operations for ALCAPA had limitations and a substantial failure rate, so I used my time during the flight to work out an alternative. By the time we were cruising high above Java, I'd designed my new operation.
I called my colleague Takahiro Katsumata when I got back to Oxford and asked him to bring Kirsty's parents to my office with a consent form. The cardiac catheter had shown precisely what Archer had suspected. Kirsty needed surgery as soon as possible.
Becky looked tired and drawn when I saw her.
I don't do transmitted anxiety if I can help it. But it's much more difficult for my anaesthetist colleagues who have to deal with the agonising separation when the patient is given over to them.
I described my planned operation to the team and explained why I felt it would be an improvement on existing techniques. The new left coronary artery would be constructed with a flap of aortic wall that would sit below a corresponding pulmonary flap to make a tube, the latter containing the misplaced origin of the left coronary artery at its apex. The product would be a new coronary artery delivering high-pressure, well-oxygenated blood directly from the aorta, where it should have come from in the first place. Blood fully saturated with oxygen would then supply the failing heart muscle and prevent further heart attacks. Katsumata was intrigued and excited by my proposed approach, so much so that he rushed off to call the hospital's film crew.
The risks of the operation were substantial. Becky's shaky hand signed the consent form and I walked back with them to the children's ward. When we reached the cot, Kirsty's heart failure was worse than I imagined. She was emaciated, her heaving ribs and rapid breathing a consequence of her congested lungs, and her abdomen swollen with fluid. Without immediate surgery she'd be dead within days. Although a voice in my head screamed, "Oh shit," my mouth correctly said, "I'll go to theatre now."
The anaesthetist knew the score, having already anaesthetised Kirsty for the cardiac catheterisation, and some of the monitoring lines were still in place.
"Do you really think you can get this baby through?" was his opening line.
I didn't reply, bidding a cheery "Good morning" to the nurses and perfusion team in the operating theatre, then went straight to the coffee room. I wanted to avoid seeing Becky leave her baby with strangers, always an excruciating event.
When I returned, Kirsty was already on the operating table, covered in green drapes held in place with an adherent plastic drape. All that was visible were her bony little chest and swollen abdomen. Heart surgery needs to be an impersonal, technical exercise.
I joined Katsumata and my six-foot, six-inch Australian colleague Matthew at the scrub sink. While we scrubbed in silence, the film camera was carefully positioned next to the operating lights. There was a palpable buzz of excitement. We were about to do something novel, esoteric and risky.
There was no bleeding as I drew the scalpel blade along the skin over Kirsty's breast bone. In shock, her skin capillaries had shut down to divert blood to vital organs. Next, the electrocauter cut through the thin layer of fat onto the bone, producing its characteristic buzzing noise accompanied by a whiff of burning as the current cauterised the oozing blood vessels, although this time there were few of these. Then the electric saw cut through the length of her sternum, exposing bright red bone marrow.
We used a small metal retractor to crank open her tiny chest, bending and stretching the joints between the ribs and the spinal column. In babies, the fleshy thymus gland lies between the sternum and the fibrous sac around the heart, but by now it had done its work producing antibodies for the foetus so we removed it.
The electrocauter continued its messy but vital work, cutting through the fibrous pericardial sac to expose the heart, straw-coloured fluid pouring out and being drawn away by the sucker. Meanwhile the other members of the team worked on silently. The anaesthetist gave heparin to stop Kirsty's blood from clotting in the heart–lung machine, the perfusion team set up the complex array of tubing, pumps and oxygenating equipment to keep Kirsty's body alive when her heart was stopped, and the scrub nurse concentrated on having the correct surgical instruments ready to slap into my palm. I rarely had to ask for anything.
As we pulled up the edges of the pericardial membrane to display the heart, Katsumata – in a moment of wry Japanese humour in times of stress – involuntarily uttered what now had become our surgical catchphrase, "Oh shit, don't mention the war." Back from his first cigarette, the anaesthetist popped his head over the drapes in response to Katsumata's comment. Others could see it all on the video screen.
What should have been a walnut-sized heart was revealed to be the size of a lemon. The enlarged right coronary artery was obvious, its many inflated branches crossing over towards the left ventricle. While the right side of the heart pumped vigorously against raised pressure in the lungs, the left ventricle was hugely dilated and barely moved.
Batches of newly necrotic muscle merged with areas of white, fibrous scar tissue, the result of the many small, painful heart attacks endured by Kirsty during her first six months of life. But Kirsty had survived to this point and it was our job to keep it that way.
Having exposed this heart I began to question the wisdom of attempting such a complex operation having come straight from a day-long flight.
But urgent heart transplants were virtually impossible in babies; this replumbing of her heart's blood supply was her only chance of life.
Tiny pipes were inserted to connect her to the heart–lung machine, and I then gave the signal to continue. The perfusion technician turned on the roller pump and Kirsty's heart gradually emptied. At this point, technology had taken over, diverting blood away from her lungs and into the synthetic oxygenator.
With her empty heart still beating I cut through the pulmonary artery above the origin of the anomalous coronary, which sat there like the pearl in an oyster. Now we had to connect it without tension to the high-pressure aorta that lay an inch away. The conventional method was simply to trying to stretch and re-implant the origin of the vessel into the side of the aorta. But this could result in thrombosis and blockage, so I pressed on with my new technique.
This delicate exercise could only be achieved by clamping the aorta and temporarily stopping all blood flow to the heart. We'd protect the muscle by infusing cardioplegia fluid directly into both coronary arteries, flushing all the blood out and collapsing the ventricle like a punctured football. This induced state of inactivity, common in heart surgery, is reversed simply by removing the clamp on the aorta, which allows blood from the heart–lung machine to flow back into the coronary arteries.
For the reconstruction of this tiny vessel, the stitching had to be precise, accurate and watertight. The procedure went well. Just thirty minutes after the heart was stopped, the conjoined flaps restored Kirsty's coronary artery anatomy to what it should have been.
As the clamp was removed, bright red oxygenated blood – rather than de-oxygenated blue blood – flooded the left ventricular muscle. Her heart changed from a pale pink colour to deep purple, then became almost black in parts. Before re-constructing the pulmonary artery we checked that there was no bleeding from the lines of stitching behind it. Soon the electro-cardiogram showed uncoordinated electrical activity, and the heart stiffened with renewed muscle tone.
Unusually for a child, her reperfused heart kept writhing and squirming in ventricular fibrillation. We used an electric shock directly through the muscle to restore normal rhythm. Ten volts – zap! The heart defibrillated and stopped wriggling. It was now motionless but we expected a normal rhythm to resume at any moment.
But it didn't. The purple ball fibrillated and squirmed again, and the anaesthetist's head popped over the drapes to request the obvious – "Shock it again!" We did and the same thing happened. It wasn't coming back.
This was serious electrical instability caused by the scar tissue, so we gave the appropriate drugs to stabilise the muscle cell membranes.
"Let's give it more reperfusion time," I told the anaesthetist.
"OK, I'll go out for a fag then," he said.
Twenty minutes later we tried again. Twenty volts – zap! This time her whole little body levitated from the operating table and her heart defibrillated. Although it slowly began to beat, it was barely more than a flicker. Ominous, but we had drugs in reserve to make it pump harder.
I asked the anaesthetist to start an adrenaline infusion and told the perfusionist to cut back on pump flow to leave some blood in the heart. This was operating theatre protocol, and it's just like the military. You make a request to a medical colleague but give orders to the technical staff. If you start giving orders to an anaesthetist they'll tell you to piss off, and will go off and do something different.
My gaze remained fixed on Kirsty's pathetic little heart. The new coronary artery was fine – there was no kink in the tube and no bleeding. For the first time, the left ventricle was receiving well-oxygenated blood at the same pressure as the rest of the body. But her heart still looked like an overripe plum and was barely beating at all. What I was thinking was we're stuffed, this heart's had it; great operation – dead baby.
Of course, I didn't let the others know my thoughts but I was starting to fade. I suggested that the cameraman should stop filming for a while because nothing was going to change and asked Katsumata to come to my side of the operating table while I took a break.
I removed my gown and gloves, and went to make a call in the anaesthetic room. Mike followed.
"Can you repair it?" he asked me.
"Don't think so."
"I'll get Archer to warn the parents, then."
I slumped on a stool and picked up the phone. One of the lovely nurses put a coffee and doughnut in front of me.
In five minutes, Archer was down from his outpatient clinic at the theatre door. He didn't need to ask.
My bladder was full and I wandered off to the loo. When I got back, my brain had regained control without that distraction and I now really needed to focus. What, if anything, could I do to make things better? I was running out of ideas.
The left ventricle was scarred, dilated and now globular – not the normal elliptical shape. This distortion had pulled open the mitral valve and prevented it from closing. As the left ventricle tried to pump blood around the body as much as half of it flowed backwards to the lungs. Heart function is always temporarily worsened during surgery, but in Kirsty's case it seemed terminal. I'd hoped that resting the heart on the bypass machine would help it to recover. It hadn't.
I went back to the operating theatre, scrubbed up again and switched with Katsumata. He said nothing, but looked crestfallen – a clear message. I asked the anaesthetist to start ventilating the lungs and told the perfusionist to prepare to slowly ease off the machine. At this point, Kirsty's heart needed to take over and support the circulation, otherwise she'd die on the operating table. We all stared at the traces on the screen, hoping to see her blood pressure rise. It briefly reached half normal, but then fell away rapidly as the pump was switched off.
"Shall we go back on?" asked Katsumata.
Watching the left ventricle flicker on the echo, the perfusionist questioned whether it was worth it.
I wasn't yet ready to call it. Failure would mean death for the little girl and a life of torment for the parents.
"Let's go back on, give it another half hour."
This in itself was problematic, as a long bypass time always lessened the chance of recovery.
Kirsty's parents were waiting in the children's ward – Archer had gone to warn them. When we called him back, Becky insisted on coming to the doors of the operating theatre complex with him. Should I tell her that the heart was too badly damaged, that the diagnosis should have been made months ago and that Kirsty had been let down by an overburdened system?
On the very rare occasions that a child died on the operating table I always talked to the parents myself. It was something I dreaded, the very worst part of my job.
The entrance to the theatre complex opened automatically onto the hospital corridor. I was immediately confronted by eyes full of grief and desperation. I remember Becky saying, "Please save my little girl." I was pole-axed. I turned back to the sombre theatre, put on a new mask and scrubbed up again.
The anaesthetist had finished yet another cigarette, and said, "Things are no better. Can we turn the pump off?"
"No, I'm going to try one more thing. Turn the lungs off. Run the camera again."
This was my last-gasp attempt. It was something that could only be justified by invoking the laws of physics and had never been done before in a child. The tension on the wall of Kirsty's scarred left ventricle was elevated because of the size of the cavity. From a recent conference, I knew that a Brazilian surgeon had made a series of failing adult hearts smaller when a tropical infection, Chagas disease, had weakened the muscle. The operation had been attempted for other types of heart failure patients in North America but was quickly discredited and abandoned. In my view, this bold approach was Kirsty's last hope.
I was not going to risk stopping the heart again, so I took a glistening new scalpel and cut the beating left ventricle wide open from apex to base, just like unzipping a sleeping bag. I began in an area of scar, carefully avoiding the muscles that support the mitral valve, and the filleted heart immediately fibrillated in response to cutting. This was fine because there was no risk of it pumping air.
Frankly, I was stunned by the unexpected appearance of the inner lining of the heart. It was covered in thick, white scar tissue. To reduce the diameter of the ventricle I cut away the scar tissue on either side of the incision until I reached bleeding muscle and then removed one third of the circumference of the chamber.
In an attempt to stop the mitral valve from leaking I sewed the central point of its two leaflets together, turning it from an oval to a double orifice structure resembling a pair of spectacles. Then I simply sewed the muscle edges together with a double row of stitches to close the heart. In the end, this much smaller heart looked like a quivering black banana. Not for a moment did I think it would ever start again – and nor did my colleagues. Most of them thought I was crazy.
Word of the bizarre operation in Theatre 5 soon spread. The curious gathered to watch and the camera kept on filming. We had to ensure that all air was removed from the heart, otherwise it could be ejected into the blood vessels of the brain and cause a stroke. After that, all that remained was to defibrillate and try to restore normal heart rhythm.
"We're done," I announced. "Try 20 volts."
Zap! The heart stopped quivering, and for what seemed like an age there was no spontaneous electrical activity. I poked the muscle with forceps and it contracted in response. This time there was a flicker on the blood pressure trace. Miraculously, the black banana had ejected blood into the aorta.
The anaesthetist looked again at the echo. "It certainly looks different. Shall we try using the pacemaker?"
I was already sewing the fine pacing wires into place. We arbitrarily set the pacing box rate at 100 beats per minute and switched it on. I told the perfusionist to cut back on the pump flow rate and leave blood in the heart to see if it would eject consistently. It did. What's more, the echo showed that the mitral valve no longer leaked. At this point I felt that we were in with a chance. Life really does depend upon physics and geometry.
It was now after midday. Kirsty had been on the bypass machine for more than three hours and we needed to get her off it. As if timed to perfection, her own heart rhythm suddenly broke through the pacing. Coordinated natural heart rhythm is much more efficient than electrical pacing, providing much better blood flow and pressure.
It was like switching on a light in the operating theatre. Gloom changed to elation, adrenaline kicked in and my fatigue suddenly lifted. We gave Kirsty an infusion of adrenaline to help her heart take over from the bypass machine. Finally I gave the instruction to"'come off slowly". We still expected her blood pressure to fade, yet the curiously reconfigured little heart kept on pumping.
I remained silent, but I looked over my mask at Katsumata. He knew that I'd had enough by now. "Let me finish," he said.
I took a last, disbelieving glance at the little black banana pumping away, then turned to the echo screen, where the incomprehensible flashes of white, blue and yellow were also reassuring, like a blazing fire. We could see blood streaming through the new left coronary and a double jet entering the left ventricle through the mitral valve – a curiously reconfigured baby's heart that finally worked.
Katsumata made certain that there was no bleeding, then meticulously closed the chest.
"Never been done before," he said, looking over at me. Soon afterwards Becky came down to the theatre in shock. After the encounter at the theatre door, she believed Kirsty had died. She put her hand on her baby's little foot and exclaimed, "It's warm. It's never been warm." When she started to cry I left. It had been a long day.
We followed Kirsty carefully over the following ten years, using echocardiography to watch her heart develop. She was a perfect little girl, happy, outgoing and energetic, the only clue to her extraordinary internal metamorphosis being the faint stripe up the middle of her chest.
When we felt she was mature enough to discuss it, we asked for her permission to carry out a magnetic resonance imaging scan to show us how the remodelled heart had developed. What we found was quite extraordinary. Apart from the double-orifice mitral valve her heart appeared normal, as did her new left coronary artery. Only the thin nest of scars showed the position of the line of stitches up the heart. Remarkably, all other scar tissue had disappeared. The whole inner lining of her left ventricle had been pure white scar tissue – now all gone.
This provided some of the first evidence that an infant's own cardiac stem cells can regenerate heart muscle and actually remove fibrous tissue. Adult hearts cannot recover in the same way. But what if we could identify and culture stem cells that could do just this for an adult heart? One day I'd find out.
Now aged eighteen, Kirsty is a vivacious and athletic teenager. Had she died we'd never have known about this exciting possibility for heart regeneration.
This is an edited extract from Fragile Lives by Stephen Westaby, published by HarperCollins, available from February 20, RRP$32.99.
It was early on in my training that I realised that
parenting is often if shaped by the infant.Cues from the infant and responses from the parents especially mother in
many cases will help shape the child to be what it will be.Much disturbance is seen in mother-infant
coupling when mother for what ever reason insists on basically bull-dosing
through a rigid way of upbringing the infant.This is one of the reasons why despite popularities, parental guidelines
do not work that well except in situations when the mother realised the need to
follow her instinct.
In the spring of 1975 I found myself in a
psychotherapy supervision session dedicated entirely to autism and attended by
all trainees in the centre.
The supervisor, Frances Tustin, wore a head of thick
pure white hair. Very short and of rather solid build, she used to wear only
trousers, which seemed to be the only sensible wear for a child
psychotherapist, and a very simple pinafore. She spoke with gesticulating arms
in front of her. She was basically a Kleinian. Like many of them, I think she
adapted. She must have been in her mid 60s and by then and for a long time her
patients were mostly severely autistic children, the ones most people would
gladly send to some god-forsaken place on the other side of the planet, at
great expense to the local authority to ease their own guilt of not being able
to offer much locally. She was thus naturally cuddly – cuddly enough to counter
the world’s most “un-cuddly”, the “autists”.I have no doubt she cuddled many of them - those who became frightened
as she led them session after session through the dark underworld of their
closed and rather terrifying mind. Nor have I any doubt that if she needed to
break rules she would. After all, offering psychotherapy to autistic children
was rule breaking in itself.
Many of her patients were at the High Wick hospital, a
unit set up just for autistic children. People think a race is now on to
decipher the brains of autists. All I can say is that the race was on then for
perhaps a different aspect of the brain, and as long as we have autists the
race continues.
It was not until some years later that I realised the
significance of Tustin’s
influence, from the way she walked to the way she smiled. What is important is
that she taught us not to be afraid. She was not afraid to challenge
conventional views. She was not afraid because she did not think autism was
such a terrible hopeless condition. She was therefore able to try all kinds of
little tricks. She never went along completely with the tight defences of these
little “autists”. She got them to know and love her and then she would begin to
dismantle their defences so that they could begin to adjust faster to a
changing environment, namely to cope with life. She really was the pioneer of
therapies that build in step-by-step challenges for these children. It is a
principle that can indeed be applied to other psychiatric conditions such as
anorexia, other eating disorders and addiction. Through therapy these children
learn to laugh at their own silliness. They learn to cope with little
frustrations and modify their demands when they find the therapist not giving
in to them. Being afraid of one’s child, whether normal or otherwise, is not a
good idea. Strangely, many mothers found it hard to accept when their little
“autist” changed.
Tustin’s other great
ability was her innate talent of simplifying things. Some of the greatest
teachers I have met had the ability to use the simplest language to explain the
most complex things. By the late 70s most others seemed to revel at the use of
complex words to throw us simple folks off balance. Not so our supervisor.
Once in Paris
I was in the presence of many eminent psychiatrists who were all deep into
psychotherapy. I mentioned a few names -
no real response. Then in another bit of
conversation I mentioned casually that I had about two and a half years of
weekly supervision from Frances Tustin. Everybody suddenly wanted to talk with
me to find out more.
When I eventually left the Tavistock and became a
Senior Registrar, I had the good fortune of working in a set-up for children
and parents with three inpatient units. One unit was for the admission of the
middle age group children of age nine to fourteen. Another unit was for the
admission of, wait for this, whole families. The last unit, named The
Pavillion, was dedicated to inpatient work with autistic children.
It was at The Pavillion that I first formulated my own
view on entrenchment.
A mother was shocked on a lunch time visit to find her
little Gerry eating peas.
“Darling, I thought you didn’t like peas.”
“I like them now.”
Mother, now finding it difficult to save face, turned
to one of the nurses and said, “Honest – he would be sick.”
“He will be fine, he has been having peas for days,”
said the nurse.
“These are good,” the autist added, without even
looking up at mum.
Entrenchment is a trap into which so many parents can
fall.They do not need an autistic
child. The healthier children try to break out and we have rebelliousness.Others succumb and we have mental illness.
This is not the place to argue about the pros and cons
of admitting autistic children as inpatients. The pea eating episode
demonstrated to me the great value of inpatient observation. Many see
separating the child from the family as cruel and yet I have seen many valuable
changes in these children and their families that could not have been achieved
by any other way.
Anthony
One day a referral came of a boy called Anthony
Wordsworth.He had just turned three.
“You will like Mrs Wordsworth.”No reason was given. “Mr Wordsworth will
probably not come to see you as he has a very important job in the City.Anthony is such a handsome boy, a bit quiet,
and I think you will like him too.”
The Wordsworths lived in one of these big houses and
Mrs Wordsworth looked very young for a mother with two children, the older one
being nine. I marvelled some years later how with all the hard work her two
children put her through she still managed to look that young. The wonders of
modern make-up together with smart dresses might have deceived.
Anthony was truly autistic. At that time one of my
juniors had just returned to work with me after having her twins.She sat through the first session.
She said to me afterwards, “I thought they do not make
Kanner’s classics anymore.” Anthony was
a Kanner’s Classic. Leo Kanner first
described the classical autistic child in 1943 and there had not been a better
description since. Not many children
have all the classical symptoms, but one finds the diagnosis of Autistic
Spectrum Disorder (ASD) more and more common place[1].
I said, “Yes, even down to the good looks.”
I often wondered if our creator really has such a
sense of humour or is everything just chance.
One could not but feel sorry for the mother.Later I found out that she came knowing that
autism would be my diagnosis, and if I had come to anything different, I
probably would have never seen her or Anthony again.
She knew of the
diagnosis from very tragic personal experience. Her own brother was diagnosed
such in London
by our very eminent Professor who was the world’s authority on autism.
In other words, she had lived, breathed and dreamed
autism all her life and now her worst nightmare was realised. Her own child had
turned out to be autistic like her own brother.
Perhaps her years of looking after her brother had
prepared her for this day. Perhaps our creator made sure that for those who
were going to have difficult children, they were made tough enough.
Anthony’s older brother was smart and clever. She felt
good then that perhaps genetics was not at play, and her worst fear was
unfounded.
I was once consulted by a grandmother on a very tragic
situation. She had two daughters. One was severely autistic, and the other was
very intelligent and a high achiever. The latter became an academic, married and
received the best genetic counselling from the same university where she was a
professor. Minimal chance, she was told. She went ahead and the first child was
subsequently diagnosed as suffering from Retts Syndrome[2].She was not really seeking any second opinion
but wanted to know if Retts and Autism were the same.This case reminded me of the old Yiddish
saying “Men tracht un Got lacht” – If you want to make God laugh, tell him your
plans.
Anthony’s mother went on to tell me she was going to
take matters into her own hands because she would not want her son to
deteriorate like her own brother, who was thirty five and living in an
institution.
“Mrs Wordsworth, I belong to that small group of
doctors who believe that the brain is really capable of a good deal more. But
we have to give it the right input.”
This principle has been applied to the treatment of
autism over the last fifteen years and the results are really quite exciting.
We do not pretend to know the cause or causes of autism but I have been with
some great pioneer workers and I believe that the old thinking that things
cannot change is not entirely true.
She started crying and Anthony came towards her.
Even with the best breeding there was only so much one
could hold back.
It was a moving sight, more because Anthony moved
towards mum. What a positive sign.
“I would like to arrange for Anthony to see the same
Professor that saw your brother. This is
not because I do not trust my own diagnosis, but I think it may be what you
would like but dare not request. It
would be good for our future work together if you do go and see him.
“Before the appointment which could be a while, there
is something you can start if you are not doing already. Do not stop talking to
Anthony. Give him running commentaries on what you are doing even if it is
about tidying the place, getting his dinner or doing his laundry.”
“Don’t wait for his response,” I emphasized.
Many new parents tend to parent by responding to cues
given to them. There is nothing wrong with that. We talk to our kids when they
talk to us and we leave them alone if they want to play on their own. Sometimes
parents insist that quiet play is actually good for their children when they
themselves want some peace and quiet.
With autistic children one may have to wait a very
long time for those cues and they may never come.
“To be honest, I have been doing quite a bit of that,
but I was not sure if it was right or wrong and I never dare tell anyone, not
even my husband.”
It is always that much better to suggest something
that a parent is already doing. First you are no longer instructing her and
second you are more likely to succeed. She had been using her instinct and
using it well.
She cried even more and told my secretary later that
she was more moved because I seemed to know what she wanted and I saved her the
embarrassment of having to ask me herself. She was planning to pluck up courage to ask me
for a referral to the Professor towards the end of the session. It was not so much that she doubted my
diagnosis but that she thought the Professor needed to know that there were now
two cases in her family.
Mrs Wordsworth did get her appointment pretty quickly.
No surprises. The diagnosis was confirmed. The Professor thought some of my suggestions
seemed interesting enough and Anthony would be best served attending the clinic
locally. He was grateful for the update
on her brother’s family history. He
thought that Anthony’s major long term handicap would probably be his speech.
With the Professor’s blessing, we could now start.
We were aiming for very small changes but the feed
would come from the parents and I wanted to get her husband involved if
possible.
“I told him everything after our first meeting. It’s a
good job you referred us to London.
I think he will be upset for a while but he will come round.”
Denial is a useful if ineffectual defence, but now we
needed to get results.
It was time to have something for show.
“Do you think Anthony will have a speech impediment or
handicap in that area?”
“You’ve heard
the Professor but we are not going to stop doing things just because problem
was predicted. The best doctors do not mind being proved wrong now and again.”
Mother
produced a video tape.A recording of a
90-minute period of her at home with Anthony.
“At this rate
he will speak before three and a half, don’t you think?” I joked.
“Like my
brother you mean.”She has already told
me that her brother had a serious speech problem.
At three years and four months Anthony spoke. He did
not just speak. He was in full sentences.
I said to mother, you have delivered.
Father came to see me the following session. I
listened and picked out as many positive aspects as I could and encouraged him
to just get on the floor and play with him. It was easy for me as I was already
on the floor helping Anthony sort out a complex rail system that we had just
acquired.
In our work, you sometimes just have to have fun.
One little boy once observed, “Do you live here, Dr
Zhang? It must be fun, with so many toys to play with.”
We worked on entrenchment and we worked on
expectation. We also ventured into something newer – putting challenges and
obstacles through play into Anthony’s life.
Then we tried something even more daring – introducing
imagination.
Steven
About eight months after first seeing Anthony I had
another full blown autism case referred to me at a different clinic.
Steven was the younger of two brothers. His older
brother had been a bit of a model child who never gave mother any trouble.
Father was a pilot.Mother used to fly
but had now switched to ground work. They had help at home.
Mother realised that there was trouble when she found
that Steven was counting lamp posts or rather reading the numbers on lamp
posts. If for any reason she deviated
from his normal route he would become very upset. Speech was otherwise minimal but he could read
numbers from an early age, too early for mother to remember when.One day he was counting as he was piling up
building blocks, one of these early learning ones with alphabets on them.He counted beyond twenty. But not much of anything else, no interest in
colour, only numbers.
He liked lining up his brother’s Dinky cars. The main
enjoyment was in the counting. One day the parents realised that it was the way
the two brothers communicated and they felt his brother was responsible for
helping him with the counting.
But then reading the numbers – do we have a genius or
what?
The answer was we had a boy who suffered from autism.
I tried to be frank and open with the parents, but I
was probably a bit too frank for them. Both parents admitted later to the
initial shock but felt that because I put it so confidently they might as well
accept it. They said it would have been worse if I had suggested some tests to
stall the time only to give them the diagnosis a week or two later. Those two
weeks of “is he, is he not?” would have been more damaging.
What helped them was my positive attitude towards the
future and they could not wait to get started.
One of Steven’s problems was coping with change and
mother often had to endure two to three hours of crying until he fell asleep
from the exhaustion, only to have him wake up two hour later to resume the
crying.
By then I had developed various strategies and tactics
with which I could bring the parents on board. Steven’s parents were
exceptional, and they tried to come to appointments together, changing
appointments if they clash with his flight schedule.
We had been working hard on imaginary things – of fake
cups of tea that was too hot or too sweet; of food that burnt the baby; and of
the hurt when a child fell.He was
beginning to buy into a lot of that.
Coming to the clinic still posed some problems for
Steven. He found it difficult that the doctor needed to see someone else. I was certainly responsible for his reluctance
to leave. We had such fun together.
One day both parents arrived with big grins on their
face. They told my secretary Marjorie that I had to wait till the end of the
session but they hoped it would work.
I could hardly wait.
“Steven, five minutes,” mother warned him as per usual
practice.
No response.
“Two minutes.”
No response.
The suspense
was killing me.
“One minute.”
Steven went
over to his school bag. He took out something. I could not see what it was as
it was imaginary. How stupid of me.
He put in two batteries. I could not see those either.
With his other hand, he drew a big squarish thing in
front of him that would have included most of me and my background. He aimed
his thing and pressed.
“Swish-swosh-swish
.”
“Ready. Mummy
and daddy.”
Steven had
turned the session into a TV episode. He was now in control with his remote
control. I was basically switched off.
Two very proud parents walked off very swiftly with
Steven in tow.
“See you next time Marjorie,” Steven waved to my
secretary. She approved. No crying from Steven.